The summary scores for each sub-compact crossover tells us both are really good cars but each has own its strengths and weaknesses. The CX-3 is clearly more stylish and dynamic on the road, but comes up short with how the interior is packaged and the overall value.
The Honda HR-V is plain vanilla inside and out but it excels where the CX-3 comes up short in in terms of usable interior space and value. Just don’t expect the mini-ute to exude a lot of performance when laying down the hammer.
If I had to pick a winner, it would be the Honda HR-V. The Honda’s reputation for dependability, combined with its efficiency with fuel and space is where I would sink my money if shopping for a sub-compact crossover.
| Ratings Overview | Mazda CX-3 | Honda HR-V |
| Style | 4.5/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Performance | 4/5 | 3/5 |
| Utility | 2.5/5 | 5/5 |
| Compared to the competition | 3.5/5 | 4/5 |
| Fuel economy | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| Value | 3.5/5 | 4/5 |
Summary |
4/5 | 4/5 |
