• The 2017 Mazda3 Offers a Unique Blend of Style and Driving Dynamics Seldom Matched by Rival Compact Cars (Review)

    The popular 2017 Mazda3 scores in many areas, including driving fun, practicality and value for the money. The 2017 model ups the ante with revised styling, an upgraded interior and more refinement.

    New safety features, either standard or optional, include blind spot monitoring, cross-traffic alert, lane-keep assist and radar cruise control.

    New are a revised front design, upgraded interior with more storage space, better materials, added sound insulation new console with covered cupholders, and new “G-vectoring control” for better stability on subpar roads and during rain and snow.

    I’m very familiar with Mazdas, which always seem to have a European flavor. I  owned a quick 1974 Mazda RX-4 coupe with a smooth rotary engine and aircraft-inspired dashboard. However, my wife disliked its manual choke, so I sold it. I owned it during a national gas shortage, and it only got 14 miles per gallon in town. I envied a neighbor who owned a racy 1972 Mazda Cosmo rotary engine sports coupe. It cost $4,390 and now is valued at $115,500.

    The 2017 Mazda comes as a compact four-door sedan or hatchback, with list prices going from $17,845 to $24,945. I tested the higher-line $23,145 Grand Touring four-door sedan, which costs $23,895 as a hatchback.

    The Grand Touring sedan’s features include custom-design 18-inch alloy wheels with 45-series tires, leather sport seats, 6-way power driver’s seat, heated front seats, automatic climate control, push-button  start (put awkwardly behind the optional heated steering wheel), 9-speaker Bose sound system, cruise control, some handy console controls and a rearview camera.

    The roomy trunk has a low, wide opening, but reaching its back end calls for an extra-long stretch. The split folding 60/40 rear seatbacks easily flip forward and greatly increase cargo room, although the pass-through area from the trunk could be a little larger..

    Mazda3s have a six-speed manual or six-speed automatic transmission. In keeping with the Mazda3’s sporting character, my test car had the manual gearbox, which shifted slickly but had a long-throw clutch that took getting used to. I recommend the automatic if you spend lots of time in traffic.

    This Mazda comes with either a 2-liter 155-horsepower four-cylinder engine or a 2.5-liter 184 horsepower four-cylinder. My test car had the nice-sounding 2.5 engine. It provided strong acceleration, although fast 65-75 m.p.h. passing was best done in fourth gear.

    The 2017 Mazda3 occasionally was going faster than I thought, so I had to slow down when, say, moving at 75 m.p.h. in a 65 m.p.h. zone. That was curious, as this car is quick, but no fireball.

    Added sound insulation has made the interior quieter, but there’s a fair amount of road noise and also wind noise on very windy days at highway speeds.

    My test car had a large tachometer, and the speedometer was a digital affair. There’s a mixture of small and large controls that are easy to use after some time is spent in the car. The multimedia system has a big center screen, but I never quite got comfortable with the infotainment system controls. A handy feature is available traffic-sign recognition, such as speed limits.

    There are plenty of cabin storage areas, and the substantial  fold-down rear armrest contains dual cupholders.

    There’s a new thick steering wheel design, and the electric power-assisted steering is precise and nicely weighted. The ride is on the firm side, but is supple. Low-profile tires help handling, as do dynamic stability and traction controls. The brake pedal has a linear action, but–like the clutch–has a rather high engagement that takes getting used to.

    Fuel economy is a long way from the RX-4’s figures: an estimated 25 miles per gallon in the city and 34 on the highway with the manual transmission and 27 and 36 with the automatic.

    Yet, I  miss the Mazda rotary engine. It powered Mazda to  victory in the famous LeMans 24-hour race in France against the world’s best racers. And Mazda’s popular RX-7 sports car had a less gas thirsty rotary engine for years.

    The newly designed front seats are supportive, and The 2017 Mazda3 comfortably handles four tall adults–or five in a pinch–in a generally roomy interior, although a tall occupant behind a tall driver may want a little more legroom.

    Safety features include front side-impact air bags and front/rear side air curtains.

    I suspect that many owners of the new Mazda3 are more likely than average car owners to check engine oil and other fluid levels, but will find the hood is heavy and held open with only a prop rod, instead of a hydraulic strut.

    Still, the 2017 Mazda3, especially my test Grand Touring model, offers features seldom matched by rival compact cars.

    Prices: $17,845-$24,495

    Dan Jedlicka
    Dan Jedlicka
    Dan Jedlicka joined the Chicago Sun-Times in February 1968 as a business news reporter and was named auto editor later that year. He has reviewed more than 4,000 new vehicles for the Sun-Times–far more than any newspaper auto writer in the country. Jedlicka also reviewed vehicles for Microsoft Corp.’s MSN Autos Internet site from January 1996 to June 2008.For more of Dan’s thoughtful and insightful reviews please visit his website, www.danjedlicka.com.
    http://www.danjedlicka.com

    Similar Articles

    3 thoughts on “The 2017 Mazda3 Offers a Unique Blend of Style and Driving Dynamics Seldom Matched by Rival Compact Cars (Review)

    1. One of the uglier cars in the segment which is odd because the first gen was so sexy and this screams I want a 65 year old man in me the hatch looks like an egg atleast it has a traditional transmission

    2. Looks are subjective. It more closely resembles its big brother Mazda6 and that’s a good thing IMO. For reference. Both my wife and I like the styling of the new Mazda line; from the New Mazda 3 all the way to the CX-9. That’s important because we often have different opinions about car styling.

    3. Your proving my point it no longer caters to the young college kids it caters to families and old people the first gen looked better less mature more boy racer-ish and it made you want to go to a car meet this makes you think can I get my ten kids in the car and get 89 mpg it’s just a difference in opinions and my opinion I wouldn’t be caught dead Pissen on one to put the fire out lol

    Leave a Reply

    Top